Showing posts with label art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label art. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Digital art-fest extravaganza

I finally bought a graphics tablet. I've been told time and time again that you shouldn't get any graphics tablet that isn't made by Wacom, but I didn't want to spend hundreds of dollars on something that really didn't seem like it should be that expensive. Browsing the graphic_design subreddit, I stumbled on this review for a $50 tablet made by Monoprice. The reviewer gave it nothing but praise, and all the comments in the reddit thread concurred that it was a great product. And if it turned out to be crap, then hey, I'm only out $50.

It's pretty fantastic. As the review shows, it has the quality and accuracy of any Wacom. I have no idea why it's so cheap, but it's one of the better purchases I've made.

I was inspired to finally get a tablet thanks to an awesome dude I'm working with at my internship. His personal work is really good, most of it is pretty trippy (his piece is one of the first things that comes up in google when you search "trippy." He's pretty proud of that). He creates most of his work in a 3D program called Zbrush, which was interesting to me, because I wasn't even aware that was an option. He's shown me some stuff in Zbrush and let me toy around with it a little, but I'm not really feeling it. It seems like it would be so much easier just to freakin' draw it out and no have to worry about 3D crap. Though, I might use it to cheat when I need a proportional human model (there are free 3D models online), because the human figure pisses me the hell off and I hate dealing with it and I don't want to spend hours and hours and hours doing terrible sketches of the human body so fuck that. I'm not interested in making human beings anyway.

Anyway the last week has me obsessed with Mass Effect again, so I really want to do a portrait of Saren or a reaper or something. I found this awesome resource on deviantart and sketched out a few reapers earlier to familiarize myself. I got plans.

Those ideas are a long ways off, I actually have to learn how to make digital art first. We're never taught these things in graphic design classes, we're taught how to do magazine layouts and business cards and logos and stuff, which I can do, but it does get a little boring and tedious sometimes. I bought a couple books on digital art and I'm going to be teaching myself for a little while before I attempt anything big. In the meantime, I've spent hours on deviantart getting jealous at how fucking good these people are. Not sure if I'll ever be this great, but it's something to aspire to.













































Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Thoughts on the Banksy/Robbo Feud

I ordered an art book full of Banksy's stuff, and it came in earlier. It's really cool. It motivated me to do a bunch of google research tonight about the history of graffiti and street art, and I ran across something I'd never heard before. There's a "war" going on between Banksy and another street artist named King Robbo.

Robbo was a legendary graffiti artist back in the 80s. He became famous by tagging trains and buildings all over London, and his name was everywhere. He never got caught, and his identity remains a secret. He eventually decided to retire, because he has kids and he didn't want to risk getting busted and losing his life.



In 2009, Robbo was interviewed for a book and said he met Banksy once: "...he decided to get cocky and say 'I’ve never heard of you', so I gave him a swift backhand and said “you may never have heard of me but you’ll never forget me” and that was that."

Shortly after the book was published, Banksy painted over the last surviving Robbo piece in existence. This is considered a huge sacrilege in the graffiti community.





When asked to respond to Robbo's account of the "slap," Banksy said this: "Is this a joke? I've never been hit by Robbo in my life. I don't know who he slapped but I hope they deserved it." He also supplied this photograph of what it looked like when he painted it, and said, "If you want things to last, you shouldn't paint them under a bridge on the canal."



If you ask me, Robbo probably pulled his story out of his ass, and Banksy got pissed. I just got finished watching a short doc about this feud, and Robbo seems like an egotistical prick, and I wouldn't put it past him to lie for cred. And I think there's a message in what Banksy did, too. To me he's basically saying that the older generation of graffiti artists always get wiped out and forgotten by the city. And that makes sense to me, because there's already generational tension in the community between the older guys who focus on stylized lettering, and the younger guys who have messages and don't mind using stencils.

The graffiti community backlashed against Banksy immediately for what he did, and he's pretty much universally despised by them at this point. Robbo's come out of retirement, and has been vandalizing every Banksy piece he can find. Banksy's been being Banksy, and has been relatively quiet about it all. Meanwhile, Robbo painted over the wall:



A short time later, letters were added in the same style so it said "FUCKING ROBBO," but it's not known if that was Banksy or Banksy's fans. Then it just went back and forth, where the parties just kept painting over each other's stuff.

With Robbo in the spotlight again, he then (in my view) took advantage of it. He began submitting and selling paintings to art galleries (many of which bashed on Banksy some more). He went to Berlin, and agreed to paint on a wall to promote a movie that would premiere in the city -- right next to one of Banksy's most iconic pieces.







Banksy's a bit overrated, I'm not some mindless slobbering fan like every average joe who's ever seen a picture of his stuff on the internet. In fact, almost everything Banksy does, some guy named Blek le Rat did it all in Paris 20 years ago. But that doesn't mean what Banky's doing doesn't matter. I think his stuff is extremely clever and important, and I have a tremendous amount of respect for him. I even doubt that the "art" part of it is a very important factor to him, which I think is why the rest of the community despises him so much. If I were to make a guess, I'd say he's probably more into the anarcho-socialist circles if anything, and it's the message that matters to him the most. He admitted a long time ago that the reason why he uses stencils is to get in quick and leave before he gets arrested. I think he's basically trolling the graffiti community, just as much as he trolls the traditional art community, and society in general.

I think what Robbo ended up doing says a lot about what this feud is really about. In the end, Robbo painted an advertisement, a monument to a beautiful celebrity who didn't do shit to deserve it -- right next to a Banky mural meant to fight against that entire bullshit system. This is an actual screenshot from that documentary with Robbo on the red carpet at the premiere of the movie.



Robbo will get rich, but Banksy gets to continue being Banksy.

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

LIZERD DERP.



Click for high res.

Progress report for a drawing I’m working on right now. I haven’t even begun shading the head yet, or messed with the different colored scales, and I gotta work on that area around the eye, and I’m not satisfied with the glares on the tongue. I’m not entirely sure what I’m going to do for the background yet. I might just spread around some charcoal, that always looks nice. I’m really excited. I know it’s pretty good so far, but whenever I get full of myself, I just do a google search for “Albrecht Durer,” and he always puts me in my place. I wish I could be Albrecht Durer. I want to make love to the corpse of Albrecht Durer, is what I’m saying.

What I find most interesting about working on this piece is how much I’m learning. I’m not talking about art skills, I’m learning about the lizard itself. You’ll notice the scales below and around the nostril sort of look cluttered and misshapen (the scales around the eye though are purposely misshapen to give the illusion of contour… to the best of my ability, at least). That area around the nose is where I first started. I was trying to figure out how the scales worked. By the time I got to the area below the mouth, you’ll notice everything is much more uniform and organized. That’s where I started to pick up on it. I explained this to my teacher and asked if she thought I should redo the scales around the nose, but she told me they still look like they fit, so I’m going to keep it. Constructive criticism encouraged.

One final thought: fuck the human figure. Good god. So hard. I’m sticking with animals for now okay. I painted a spider a couple months back and I think I do well with animals.

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Sunday Youtube Post

Disney + Dali =

Friday, May 14, 2010

Pretentious Art Post - Francisco Goya


If I had to think of one place in history I would not want to be under any circumstances, being a soldier on the battlefields of World War I is a likely candidate. Think of the most absolutely terrifying nightmare you have ever had. Now amplify that by a thousand. And imagine yourself being raped while dreaming it. With bullets. That's World War I in a nutshell. The Great War had been building up for decades. Everyone knew it was coming. Nations were anticipating it, and in a sense looking forward to it. With war, comes spoils.

No one could've imagined the devastation it would bring. How could they? Their thinking was still stuck in the 1800s. There were no 'good guys' in this. It was nothing but a 19th century war of imperialism fought on a global scale with modern weapons, and the results were indescribable. If you were fortunate enough not to be one of the millions of people killed for nothing more than clumps of earth, then you had to live on and sustain all the night terrors and thoughts of suicide for the rest of your life. The world was horrified by the status quo. And it had every right to be.

As they typically do, the artists were paying attention. This unified feeling of confusion and despair, when translated into art, paved the way for modernism, and we're left with utterly brilliant movements like dada and surrealism. People were depressed, confused, and above all, really fucking tired of war.



(These aren't Goya, these are dada and surrealism.)


This is all nice and interesting, but it really doesn't have much to do with Francisco Goya at all. Well, except that Goya had already thought of it all an entire century before. But his story is much more tragic.

The aftermath of the Napoleonic Wars made Goya lose all faith in mankind, which went completely against the Romanticist era he was in. He shut himself up in his home and spent his final years completely alone, inching ever closer to the edges of madness. During this dark time, he produced his disturbing Black Paintings. The post-WWI art movements worked because everybody agreed that the world fucking sucked and it needed to change bigtime. Virtually no one held that opinion in Goya's time except for Goya. Sure, Romanticism was typically anti-establishment, and it did occasionally cover political topics, but for the most part it had its head too far up its own ass to realize that the world really needed a big fucking shake. Goya was alone. He was powerless. It was too much. Even after the Napoleonic Wars set the world ablaze, and after millions upon millions of people lay buried, the status quo pressed forward unfazed and unchallenged. No one cared. And he couldn't do a thing. You would've gone insane too.

But Goya did have a very successful career before all this. At an earlier time in his life, he was very active in Spain's political scene. In 1808, the Spanish King Charles IV was growing increasingly unpopular, and the public threw its support behind his son Ferdinand VII, hoping he would initiate reform.

Here's Goya's portrait of the royal family. Reminiscent of Velázquez, he puts in his own portrait in the shadows on the left almost as a signature.



Ferdinand wanted to overthrow his parents, and so he ran to Napoleon for military backing. Napoleon, being such a swell guy, was eager to help. He sent French troops over to Spain, because Napoleon Bonaparte had the best interests of the Spanish people in mind. As soon as Charles was ousted, Napoleon decided that his own brother Joseph would be more suited for the Spanish throne. France was now in control of Spain. Ferdinand had been royally fucked, and I think that's the first time I've been able to use that phrase in the literal sense.

The Spanish soon acknowledged France as the hostile occupier it was. An uprising occurred on May 2, 1808, and the fighting spread throughout Madrid. Goya was in Madrid during this time, and saw all of this happening firsthand. In The Second of May, painted six years later, Goya depicts the French Imperial Guard charging into a crowd to disperse them. Instead of allowing themselves to be dispersed, the crowd fights back.



It's a companion piece to Goya's most famous painting, The Third of May. The uprising was successfully beaten down, but the French were pissed. The next day, they went around massacring unarmed civilians.



The central figure in white is a metaphor for Christ, and if you look close enough, you can see the stigmata on his hands.

In 1819, Goya wanted to isolate himself. He bought a house outside Madrid called La Quinta del Sordo. He spent most of the remainder of his life there, eventually fleeing to France once Ferdinand's absolutist monarchy returned to Spain. He often forgot canvasses altogether and painted directly onto the walls. The works he completed there are known as the Black Paintings. They were never meant to be seen by the outside world. These are said to have been a huge influence on Manet and Picasso.



Saturn Devouring His Son


The Dog


Witches' Sabbath


Two Old Men Eating Soup


Procession of the Holy Office


Now go grab some ice cream and watch cartoons or something so you can cheer the fuck up after this.

Saturday, May 1, 2010

Pretentious Art Post - Bernini

Break out the wine and cheese, because it's liberal elitism time. This Pretentious Art Post would also not be complete without pretentious music to listen to while reading it. Click on each picture to see a higher resolution.


This is Gian Lorenzo Bernini. Michelangelo perfected sculpture before his time. As if it were even possible, Bernini took it a step further. Michelangelo's sculptures were absolutely perfect for what he was intending for them, but they were still missing one thing.



What's missing in this? Action. David isn't doing anything. It's basically a contrapposto study, and nothing more. There is a legitimate debate on whether Michelangelo or Bernini were better at sculpture, though since it's generally accepted that Michelangelo was probably the greatest artist in history, most agree that he comes out on top because there would've been no Bernini had he not set the groundwork. Without him, the next big art movement would not have been possible.

After the Renaissance would come Baroque, which was obsessed with dynamic action. And at this, Bernini was the fucking master. Check out Bernini's version of David.







I mean, look at that. Look at how much stress is being put on David's muscles. He is biting his lip.

This is Pluto and Proserpina.









Tears had never been seen before in sculpture. And never had this. Your mind is about to get fucking blown.



Those fingers are pressing into her flesh. This is marble. Bernini was only 23 years old.

Apollo and Daphne



Check this shit.



How did those branches growing out of her fingers not break off when he was chipping away at them? Shitfucking dykeballs.



Damned Soul

This was one of his very first works. He was younger than me and he was already on par with some of the greatest sculptors in history.


The Ecstasy of St. Teresa


A window above takes advantage of natural light.