Conservapedia challenges Penn Jillette to a debate on the existence of God. They kick it off by calling him fat.

Conservapedia has an entire article trying to link atheism with obesity. All I have to say is that if this is how God punishes those who don't believe in Him, then He's really gone soft since his glory days in the Old Testament. He had Job's entire family killed because he believed in Him.

The entry points out specific atheists by name, calls them fat, and posts pictures of them. Of course, they ignore atheists with normal weight like Richard Dawkins, or Sam Harris, or myself, or pretty much every atheist I've ever met. Likewise, they point out good God-fearing Christians as prime examples of how one's body should look, while ignoring overweight Christians like every person you meet driving through the Bible belt.





I know what you're thinking, and no, this is not a joke site. Conservapedia's founder really believes this shit.

Well, Penn Jillette was made aware that Conservapedia mentioned him by name, and he made a video about it. Here it is.



Welp, in typical high school internet fight fashion, Conservapedia responded to Penn's video.

Conservapedia was informed that the atheist Penn Jillette made a video response to Conservapedia's atheism and obesity article which was entitled "Are you a fat atheist?". I wish I could offer a link to his video, but unfortunately Mr. Jilette's "response" was laced with profanity. However, should he decide to muster a good faith bona fide response in the future to Conservapedia's atheism and obesity article which contains no profanity I will most gladly link to it.

See? This proves the immorality of atheists. You don't see Christians using bad words. Christians once again prove how morally superior they are by calling people fat and displaying pictures of their fatness.

But that wasn't enough, apparently. Before seeing any response from Penn, they've decided to challenge him to a debate.

Without any further ado here is my debate challenge to atheist Penn Jillette:

I challenge Penn Jillette to a written debate. The debate will be between Penn Jillette and two atheists of his choosing and myself and two Christians of my choosing. I prefer written debates as I believe they offer the audience the maximum amount of information to render a decision.

The subject of the debate will be: "Does God exist?". The content of the written debate will be offered to the public as public domain content.

It continues with Five suggestions to Penn Jillette:

1. Please be ready to offer proof and evidence that atheism is true.

2. Please be ready to answer the "15 questions that evolutionists cannot answer" which are featured in Creation Ministries International's Question evolution! campaign.

3. Consider reading Conservapedia's atheism article and the Conservepedia Christian apologetics article to better prepare you for the debate. You may find you want to change sides and debate on the Christian side of the aisle given the abundant evidence for Christianity and the lack of proof and evidence for atheism. [...]

4. Please consider losing some weight. I certainly don't want you to claim you could have done better in the debate if your body and mental acumen had been operating at "full atheist power". I am giving you 150 days to shed your flabby physique and replace it with a "mean, lean, atheism debating machine". Given the "superior atheist intellect" which you no doubt possess, I am sure if you put your mind to it that you will be able to lose the weight. However, if you need more time, I can certainly accommodate you. I have put some helpful resources below which offers some of the best information from medical science, exercise science and nutritional science as I know that many atheists purport to love science. Plus, according to medical science, there are a number of health risks associated with being overweight which are cited in Conservapedia's Atheism and Mental and Physical Health article.

5. Although you might want Richard Dawkins to be a debate partner, please consider this information:

In a letter to fellow atheist and evolutionist Richard Dawkins which was subsequently quoted by The Daily Telegraph, fellow atheist Dr. Daniel Came wrote concerning Dawkins' refusal to debate the Christian apologist Dr. William Lane Craig:

"The absence of a debate with the foremost apologist for Christian theism is a glaring omission on your CV and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."

I would encourage you to ask Richard Dawkins to be a debate partner, but please do not be disappointed if he declines as he often is reluctant to leave his "intellectual bunny hole".

lol you should read my website so you'll convert to christinarty, oh and also you're fat fuck