Saturday, March 14, 2009

Oh man, check this out. It looks like some guy I barely know posted this on facebook a few months ago.

---


On election day 1789 the American people cast their ballots for president for the first time in our nations history. While there were most certainly several issues and positions the candidates took that drove the voter to a particular side, one thing was clear. The American people wanted leadership and innate character from their president.
  • Washington ran unopposed, so no one considered anything really.
I believe that has rung true up until this year’s election. Sure we have made mistakes with examples being the sexual deviant and chief Bill Clinton, the dunce in chief Jimmy Carter and the socialist in chief Franklin D. Roosevelt. But the American people did see the presidential characteristics in these men no matter how flawed they were.
  • LIBRUL IN CHIEF LOL.
But today, we could be on the verge of electing the, as John McCain put it, redistributionist and chief or as I’d like to call him comrade in chief Barrack Obama. This is a man who I in no way see Americans finding innate character or leadership from.

Let’s look at character. He was a member of a racist church while lying to the American people when he said he had left since the new minister was at a rally of Obama’s over the weekend [lol this sentence]. He hung around with terrorists who bombed American targets. He admittedly was a drug dealer which the statute of limitations has not passed which actually would send any ordinary citizen to prison.
  • Obama and Wright are old friends because they worked in the same neighborhoods. Being in the presence of a minister does not make you a member of his church, nor does it mean you automatically agree with every word that comes out of his mouth. Sarah Palin's church had a speaker who claimed to be a witch hunter, and another who said the murder of Jews was the judgment of God. Those are perfectly fine though.
  • Bill Ayers is a lot closer to the mayor of Chicago, but you're not calling him a terrorist. Ayers teaches at U of I, but you're not calling that school a madrasah. Barack Obama and William Ayers are casual acquaintances, at best. He served his time and was released back into society, it isn't a difficult concept to understand.
  • Doing drugs is not the same as dealing drugs. He was a teenager, he had no father, and he was struggling with an identity. I would tell you to pick up his autobiography so he can explain it to you himself, but you're probably convinced book lernin' poisons the mind.
Now for leadership. He can’t make a decision with all of the present votes he’s cast in his career. His only accomplishments in the U.S. Senate has been co-sponsoring legislation which is nothing but supporting it. He has never run a business, he has never led any troops, and quite frankly I believe Michelle Obama is running his marriage.
  • Here are Barack Obama's accomplishments in the Senate.
  • A quick google search implies John McCain never ran a business either. George Bush is a failed businessman.
  • John McCain's never led troops. And I thought veterans were dumb? Don't you remember back in 2004 when you guys made fun of John Kerry for receiving two purple hearts in Vietnam?
  • And concerning the Obama marriage, I'm glad to see that American voters take irrelevant "feelings" of theirs into account, instead of hard facts that actually matter. Regardless, you're retarded because they seem extremely happy to me.
I know throwing the terms socialist and communist out there is just considered name calling. But these are true statements about Obama.
  • No they're not.
Look at the tactics. Going after an ordinary citizen for asking a tough question telling all Americans not to even think about disagreeing with him. Punishing media outlets for simply questioning him. Trying to rig elections by illegal votes.
  • Name one time Barack Obama mentioned Joe the Plumber's name after the third Presidential Debate. One.
  • Haha, Fox News a legitimate media outlet. Good one. He didn't shut them out for "simply questioning him," he shut them out because they spread blatant propaganda about him. He went back for an O'Reilly interview anyway, don't complain.
  • And the Supreme Court, which is conservative, threw out the Acorn case because even they could see how much of a gigantic pile of fanatically partisan horse shit it was.
And how about his positions. Redistribute the wealth and grow the economy from the bottom up. How stupid is he? You can’t grow the economy from the bottom up. A poor man doesn’t give anyone a job. And how did he ever pass a constitutional law class? He wants justices who have empathy and he wants to pull the blindfold off of lady justice.
  • Conservatives are fine with redistributing the wealth as long as it's being redistributed to the richest 1% of the country.
  • You CAN grow the economy from the bottom up. It cannot grow if money isn't being put back into it, and it's the middle and lower classes who buy the most shit when they actually have money to do it with. We tried it your way for eight years, and now look where we're at.
  • Obama taught Constitutional Law for a number of years.
  • I don't really know where your last sentence is coming from, so I'll just assume you pulled it out of your smelly ass.
Barrack Obama is quite simply a shame to our nation in the fact that there is a good chance he could be our next president. But there is still a chance to right that. While I have had my disagreements with John McCain, I know 100% that he is a man with innate character and he is a true leader. There is no doubt. If you care about freedom, if you care about prosperity and if you care about the decency of America please vote for John McCain.
  • The decency of America is exactly what I took into account when I cast my vote. I don't want a dumbshit hockey mom to be the second in command of the most powerful nation the earth has ever seen. Are you retarded or something?
---


Do Republicans want to know why the college vote went unanimously to Obama? Because they based John McCain's entire campaign on arguments like these.

No comments:

Post a Comment